Comparing Changes within the Publishing and Travel Industries

During the 1990s, massive challenges to the traditional structure of both the Publishing Industry and the Travel Industry started to emerge due to the prevalence of the Internet. Granados et. al (2008) state that the Internet “offered a low-cost distribution channel for new entrants who could make a lot of profit, as incumbent firms chose not to explore the new channels initially” (p. 76), which as will be demonstrated, both industries did not. Although both industries have not been affected directly the same, parallels will be drawn between the two, and their differences highlighted.

Both the Travel Industry and the Publishing Industry involve intermediaries, or more colloquially “middlemen”, which both traditionally took form in brick and mortar shops. In the case of the former, that would be travel agents, whereas in the latter, bookstores, and increasingly more common with the rise in eBooks, both distribution companies (warehouses, shipping, etc.) and printers. Two arguments have been made, both proving to be true in either case. With the prevalence of the Internet, it is said that it will skip intermediaries, bringing customers directly to suppliers; conversely “[i]t has also been argued that electronic markets do not become “disintermediated” but are rather facilitated by IT, with new intermediaries emerging in an electronic environment” (Lewis et. al, 1998, p. 21). We see this within both industries in different ways. In regards to the former argument, there has been a push from airlines, hotels, car rentals, etc., in offering their services online (Laverty & Media, n.d.). However, technology has allowed for competing services to traditional brick and mortar travel agencies, such as Travelocity and Expedia (Granados et. al, 2008). We see both these arguments demonstrated again within the Publishing Industry. Starting with the latter argument, there has been a decline in bookstores, most notably with the bankruptcy of Borders in 2011, which is often accredited to Amazon (Nisen, 2013). Although this has been a huge shift, with other notable ecommerce platforms usually specializing in eBooks (ex. Apple) (AppleInsider Staff, 2010), there has more recently been a push from publishers to cut out the middleman, and move towards their own ecommerce sites, most notably publishers such as Harper-Collins (Greenfield, 2014).

The digital intermediaries and the cutting out of the brick and mortar stores is only a surface similarity between the two and to best understand the change it should be asked why these industries are being replaced. One of the main similarities between the two industries is that the Internet made it easier for competitors to enter the once previous difficult markets (Granados et. al, 2008, p.74). Since the 1970s, the Travel Industry was based around Computer Reservation Systems (CRSs) which airlines would be used to “lock in travel agencies through long-term contractual agreements “(Granados et. al, 2008, p.74). This ensured the market was set up in a certain way that was expensive to enter. Online Travel Agencies joined the market and using the technology held by traditional travel agencies, they made it easier to navigate for average users. What this does is replaces the position of the travel agent with an online interface. By 2007, online bookings surpassed offline bookings (Granados et. al, 2008, p.82).

On the Publishing side, independent bookstores were threatened with the rise of the book superstore in the 1990s. This made the barrier to entry into the business increasingly more difficult for smaller stores and many shops were unable to stay in business (Cowen, 2006). Now, with the rise of ecommerce, both independent bookstores and the chain stores, as previously demonstrated with the closing of Borders, are being challenged. There are numerous reasons why people have turned to ecommerce when looking to buy books and I will use Amazon as an example for it has been frontrunner, by selling two-thirds of all online print books, which makes it the largest seller of books (Gessen, 2014). The company has the ability to offer better prices, often being accused of taking a loss in order to establish itself within the industry (Gessen, 2014). The company has numerous warehouses giving them what seems to be endless amounts of space for storage, which in turn allows them to offer a large range of books (Roberge, 2014). Another strength they possess is something shared with online travel agencies: the ability to run algorithms to suggest things to users which was once done by a sales associate, whether it’s a book to buy or different dates for different prices (Roberge, 2014; Hobica, 2011). The two also share a convenience factor; one can order a plane ticket from home and having it immediately printable, buy a book or delivered to them, or instantly downloadable as an eBook. These factors, along with the comment section and easily searchable reviews (Cowen, 2006), have replaced the sales associate and the travel agent.

It’s been shown how the loss of the brick and mortar intermediary affects the customer; however, it is necessary to compare how it affects both the publishing houses and the airlines to further analyze why these industries have changed.

Going back to the Travel Industry, one of the main factors with cutting out and changing the intermediary to an online format has been price savings for the airlines. Travel agencies have typically received most of their revenue through commissions (Lee, 2012). Airlines placed commission caps that inhibited the ability of agents to price discriminate without sacrificing these commissions (Granados et. al, 2008). These commission caps, which eventually lead to cuts (Lee, 2012) changed the industry in how they would have to change the way their business is structured to avoid bankruptcy, which will be elaborated on later. With the exception of the possible negative effects the social media can have on airlines (Carmichael, 2009), the Internet has had a positive impact. By offering tickets directly to customers, they cut out the need for middleman services both online and offline. There has even been a push to avoid customers using online services by putting penalties on customers who buy tickets through those services, such as no seat assignment till check in and half their frequent flyer miles (Mayerowitz, 2012).

In regards to the Publishing Industry, Roberge (2014) asked why a publisher would want to maintain relationships with thousands of stores when they only make up 3-5% of their sales? With this question, Roberge is referencing Amazon as it is the largest name in online bookstores. When it first appeared, it changed the industry for the better for Publishers, who were now no longer at the mercy of large chain bookstores who had the ability to buy however many copies, and have the ability to return the unsold books, which could put the Publisher at a loss (Gessen, 2014). Like the airlines, publishers were also able to save money cutting out brick and mortar stores.

This financial benefit changed when the eBook became more prevalent, much to the credit of Amazon. However, they managed to control the eBook market at the expense of the publishing houses by pricing out competitors, taking a loss in book sales, while still making profit in other areas (Gessen, 2014). This caused much turmoil for the industry and, along with the rise of the eBook, created speculation that the tradition format of the Publishing Industry was a dying one (Levin, 2012). This has created “animosity toward Amazon, which holds the majority market share of online book sales and eBook sales” (Belz, 2014), which has created a desire for bookstores to succeed.

The advent of the eBook is most similar to that of performing bookings online, rather than ordering a physical copy to be delivered, as both avoid the use of paper, brick and mortar shops, and human interaction. Although the turmoil that the Internet created for both industries affected them both in very similar ways, how both industries have adapted to the changing marketplace is quite different.

In regards to leisure travelers, it has become commonplace to plan your trip online, using it for reviews, buying tickets, and even sending out itinerary information (Vandersteen, n.d.). As been described, this has been one of the main ways the airlines have tried to cut out intermediary position, and although the battle between the airlines and online intermediaries continues, traditional brick and mortar agencies have learned to adapt, although the industry has shrunk considerably (Lee, 2012). As described by Lee (2012), many agencies focus on corporate travel, where they charge service fees. This line of work is convenient for businesses, as everything will be planned on their behalf, not having to stress over flight, rides, and hotels. Lee explains that although travel agencies no longer receive commission on flights, they still do on vacation packages and cruises, while still charging service fees on top. There has been an increased focus within the industry to provide good customer service and availability, should a problem arise.

Whereas travel agencies have seemed to find niches and new business plans, the future of the bookstore is still up in the air. Most of it depends on the future of the book itself and customers’ buying habits. Regarding the book itself, it depends on the whether physical copies will remain in demand or if eBooks are the future. Sales have shown that the buying of eBooks has slowed down (Shatzkin, 2014); however, that could just be a generational trend. If they do remain relevant, then the buying habits of consumers comes into question of whether they would rather order from an online store like Amazon, or if they would prefer to buy from stores. Some have claimed that independent bookstores will remain in business (Hawkins, 2015), some have claimed that specialty stores may have a future, but the future of chain stores is bleak (Nisen, 2013), and many others possibilities all around the spectrum.

 

Works Cited

AppleInsider Staff. (2010, January 27). Apple introduces iBooks store for iPad. Retrieved October 4, 2015, from http://appleinsider.com/articles/10/01/27/apple_introduces_ibooks_store_for_ipad

Belz, E. (2014, June 2). Are bookstores really dying out? Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://www.worldmag.com/2014/06/are_bookstores_really_dying_out

Carmichael, S. (2009, July 29). The Internet – an airline’s best friend, and their biggest enemy. Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://gadling.com/2009/07/29/the-internet-an-airlines-best-friend-and-their-biggest-enemy/

Cowen, T. (2006, May 15). What Are Independent Bookstores Really Good For? Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2006/05/what_are_independent_bookstores_really_good_for.html

Gessen, K. (2014, December 1). The War of the Words. Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://www.vanityfair.com/news/business/2014/12/amazon-hachette-ebook-publishing

Granados, N., Kauffman, R., & King, B. (2008). How Has Electronic Travel Distribution Been Transformed? A Test of the Theory of Newly Vulnerable Markets. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(2), 73-95.

Greenfield, J. (2014, July 8). HarperCollins Pivots to Sell Print and Ebooks Directly to Readers Through Main Website. Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://www.digitalbookworld.com/2014/harpercollins-pivots-to-sell-print-and-ebooks-directly-to-readers-through-main-website/

Hawkins, J. (2015, June 19). Bookstores Won’t Go the Way of Video Stores. Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://electricliterature.com/bookstores-wont-go-the-way-of-video-stores/

Hobica, G. (2011, January 2). Six reasons why we need online travel agencies. Retrieved October 5, 2015, from http://www.airfarewatchdog.com/blog/6530176/six-reasons-why-we-need-online-travel-agencies/

Laverty, S., & Media, D. (n.d.). Impact of Technology on the Travel Agency Business. Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/impact-technology-travel-agency-business-57750.html

Lee, S. (2012, July 23). How Do Travel Agents Make Money? Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://hostagencyreviews.com/how-do-travel-agents-make-money/

Levin, M. (2012, June 29). The Incredible Resilience of Publishing Fantasy. Retrieved October 4, 2015, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michaellevin/publishing-fiction_b_1637384.html

Lewis, I., Semeijn, J., & Talalayevsky, A. (1998). The Impact of Information Technology on Travel Agents. Transportation Journal, 37(4), 20-25.

Mayerowitz, S. (2012, December 9). Airlines Offer Cheaper Airfare Directly To Customers, Penalizing Online Travel Agencies. Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/12/cheap-airfare-airlines_n_1876588.html

Nisen, M. (2013, October 15). These Charts Show Just How Bad Things Are For Bookstores. Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://www.businessinsider.com/why-bookstores-are-doomed-2013-10

Roberge, T. (2014, August 18). Why We Need Independent Bookstores More Than Ever. Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://publishingperspectives.com/2014/08/why-we-need-independent-bookstores-more-than-ever/

Shatzkin, M. (2014, January 23). The future of bookstores is the key to understanding the future of publishing. Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://www.idealog.com/blog/future-bookstores-key-understanding-future-publishing/

Vandersteen, J. (n.d.). How Has the Internet Changed the Airline Industry? Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://science.opposingviews.com/internet-changed-airline-industry-1742.html

3 Comments

  1. This is a solid essay. It brings together both industries and does a nice set of comparisons , integrating the conversations of the two industries nicely, especially in the first half. It does, near the middle, take on a more narrative tone. In that middle portion, it goes on to describe the changes in the industry without much of an analysis or comparisons. Fortunately, it recovers nicely at the end. Overall, it is a well sourced and argued piece, from which we can see the parallels between the industries, and question and better understand how the Internet affects intermediaries.

  2. The topic for this paper was really interesting. It showed that the author took the effort to research about an industry that has a similar technological advancement as the publishing industry. The first sentence clearly indicated the intent of the paper and how the author was going to execute their thesis. Furthermore, all of the statements that the author made had citations, which help strengthen their argument.

    The similarities between the two industries were strong and referencing examples helped the readers connect with the topic more. However, there were some statements that could be more detailed. In paragraph six, the author mentioned how there can be possible negative impacts the airlines might have on social media, but did not give any examples or explain why. There were also some statements that were quite confusing. For an example, when the author mentioned the middleman in each industry, the example given for the publishing industry did not seem relevant to the premise. Another example was the following claim in paragraph six.

    “With the exception of the possible negative effects the social media can have on airlines (Carmichael, 2009), the Internet has had a positive impact. By offering tickets directly to customers, they cut out the need for middleman services both online and offline. There has even been a push to avoid customers using online services by putting penalties on customers who buy tickets through those services, such as no seat assignment till check in and half their frequent flyer miles (Mayerowitz, 2012).

    The last sentence was incomplete and could be clarified. Readers would question, “What happens to half their frequent flyer miles if they used the online service instead of a travel agent?” The structure of the sentences was not clear, which made it hard to read. Furthermore when the author included quotes from another source, it hindered the flow of the sentence. A solution could be to paraphrase the quote. This would show that the author understands the concept and did not just add a quote to indicate they did their research. In addition, the organization of the paper made it hard to keep track of the original argument.

    Overall the ideas for this paper were good. The author did not make any claims without showing evidence. However, the author’s arguments could be more detailed and the sentences could be a bit more clear and concise.

    • This review only picks up only on a grammatical error, but does not critique anything substantial about the paper.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2019 kcrowe. Unless otherwise noted, all material on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


Theme by Anders Noren

Up ↑